The five findings that end a raise

{{TODO: CLIENT INPUT}} - body to be written. Outline below, generated from the build spec. Delete this note and set status: published when the piece is written.

Outline

Opening. The homepage ledger states five findings without arguing them. This piece argues them. Open with the specific moment: the questionnaire arrives, the window is five days, and the first three questions are about things nobody has written down.

Why these five and not others. They recur because each one is a control that produces evidence continuously or produces none at all. There is no partial credit on a valuation policy.

1. No written valuation policy. What the assessor asks for. Why "we use a consistent approach" fails. What a policy has to contain to be useful: method by asset type, inputs, who approves, what triggers a re-mark, how changes are recorded. The test is whether a mark from twelve months ago can be reconstructed without asking the person who made it.

2. No compliance calendar. Obligations tracked in memory surface late. A dated register with named owners and evidence attached on close. Note that this is one of the cheapest findings to fix and one of the most damaging to leave open, because it reads as a governance signal rather than an admin gap.

3. No disaster recovery plan. The distinction between having a plan and having run one. Restore tests as evidence rather than backup monitoring as reassurance.

4. No formal AML and KYC procedures. The checks usually happen. What is missing is the record that they happened, to a written procedure, with a date and an owner.

5. No LP reporting samples. Why an assessor asks for a sample rather than a description, and what it means when producing one takes a week.

The pattern underneath. Each of the five is a case of a control that exists in practice but not in evidence. That gap is what the diagnostic measures and what a control environment closes.

Close. Point to the readiness scan. Do not oversell it: it is an indicative self-assessment, and saying so is part of why people trust the result.